Today's hottest deals

Asus GL552JX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus GL552JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552JX
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '22 at 06:08
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User MDG-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 93.1
54% 82.4 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 120
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 1A8D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.94% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 5.3
3% 8.63 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.94%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful SL500 240GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0727A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 204 258 265 246 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 466
Write 440
Mixed 423
SusWrite 242
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 41.9
138% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 114
115% 186 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
102GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 67 66 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 50
Write 63.7
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 66
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 0420 AM1L16BC8R2-B1QS 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 11.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552JX Builds (Compare 649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL552JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback