Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '22 at 04:19
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$158
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 165
2-Core 328
103% 192 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 981
96% 788 Pts
64-Core 1,438
89% 1,438 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6750-XT
Sapphire(1DA2 E465) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 136
Parallax 304
121% 196 fps
MRender 238
Gravity 160
Splatting 180
156% 192 fps
Poor: 124%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AMD Radeon R7 120GB-$67
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 270 167 120 124 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 275
Write 290
Mixed 189
SusWrite 185
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 7.4
24% 7.73 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 139
110% 150 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 104%
Seagate BarraCud 500GB
116GB free
Firmware: STAS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 188 339 341 346 350 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 309
Write 343
Mixed 328
SusWrite 319
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 10.8
36% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 92.8
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 84.1
79% 120 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 113%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$33
53GB free
Firmware: AX0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 53 60 62 61 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 65.8
Write 67
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 59.8
39% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
734GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 142 161 167 164 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 142
Write 156
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 161
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
228% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT16GX4M2C3200C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 32.6
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 29.7
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $499

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,586
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback