Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210924
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 10 '22 at 10:36
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10940X
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 147
2-Core 294
97% 178 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 1,120
101% 849 Pts
64-Core 2,472
153% 2,472 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 100%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Asus(1043 852E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.8% Average
Lighting 57.9
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 60.6
47% 62.8 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 59.5
Splatting 54
49% 60.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 966GB
861GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1201 981 1036 1044 1038 1043 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,911
Write 2,535
Mixed 1,729
SusWrite 1,057
408% 1,808 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 44.4
145% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 635
DQ Mixed 778
574% 761 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 219%
Great: 256%
Maxsun 240GB F7 240GB
209GB free
Firmware: S0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 56 52 48 55 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 461
Write 412
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 95
55% 251 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 26
83% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 1.3
67% 155 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 95%
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe RGB 1TB
340GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1717 1419 949 957 955 959 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 972
Write 983
Mixed 679
SusWrite 1,159
214% 948 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 24
134% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 59.4
DQ Write 815
DQ Mixed 537
386% 470 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 169%
Great: 317%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$75
111GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 79 82 82 80 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
44% Average
Read 74.2
Write 53.8
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 79.1
49% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 44%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C17 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 53.1
MC Write 62.7
MC Mixed 45.3
153% 53.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 11.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 132%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X299-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 748 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $541
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback