Today's hottest deals

HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Desktop M01-F1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87D6
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220308
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJun 03 '22 at 08:30
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 147
2-Core 288
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 892
86% 707 Pts
64-Core 1,134
70% 1,134 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 37.1
Reflection 40.9
Parallax 38.1
30% 38.7 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 27
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDHBA1T0QFD-1AX1AABHA 1TB
705GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1284 1312 1309 1332 1326 1331 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 1,442
Write 1,340
Mixed 1,062
SusWrite 1,316
290% 1,290 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 80.3
270% 94.2 MB/s
DQ Read 913
DQ Write 878
DQ Mixed 317
397% 703 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 262%
Great: 286%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64AZ-3G2E1 Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-XN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 25.8
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 29.8
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop M01-F1xxx Builds (Compare 1,156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback