Asus TUF GAMING B550M-ZAKU (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-ZAKU (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 03:07
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 82.9
1-Core 176
2-Core 324
104% 194 Pts
4-Core 664
8-Core 1,291
116% 978 Pts
64-Core 2,312
143% 2,312 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$334
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.4.2
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 141
Parallax 242
94% 166 fps
MRender 213
Gravity 117
Splatting 151
130% 160 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,020
Write 1,243
Mixed 532
277% 1,265 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 57
225% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 1,078
DQ Write 929
DQ Mixed 637
578% 882 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Sandisk PLUS 2000GB
1.5TB free
Firmware: UP4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 129 77 114 77 157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 456
Write 407
Mixed 147
SusWrite 136
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 12
72% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 32.8
46% 85.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 56%
Seagate ST10000NM0016-1T 10TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: SND0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 204 198 201 200 201 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 2400 C16 Series 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 47.1
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 33.2
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 32
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 100%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-ZAKU (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-ZAKU (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $513
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback