Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A314-32

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire A314-32  (all builds)
MotherboardGLK Bulbasaur_GL
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '22 at 15:50
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Memory 38.3
1-Core 54.4
2-Core 105
37% 66 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 211
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 203
12% 203 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Acer(1025 1253) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.75% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 0.3
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.75%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650NS38 120GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S190429a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 352 364 98 72 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 383
Write 357
Mixed 363
SusWrite 221
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 37
134% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 239
185% 251 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
423GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 114 112 116 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 98.4
Write 98.1
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 113
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston TF32D4U2S1KCH-4 Hynix 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.3% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 11.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A314-32 Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A314-32

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback