Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory18.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '22 at 16:14
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 111
53% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 212
26% 199 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32% Below average
Lighting 40.3
Reflection 44.2
Parallax 39.4
33% 41.3 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 35.1
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 258 263 261 263 267 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 351
Write 257
Mixed 317
SusWrite 270
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 33.6
81% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 165
130% 183 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$19
74GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 66 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
47% Average
Read 98.4
Write 94.5
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 65.3
60% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47%
Great: 69%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
92GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 85 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 91.4
Write 79.4
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 84.5
56% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$19
266GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 109 109 109 109 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
55% Above average
Read 83
Write 88.4
Mixed 57
SusWrite 109
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.9% Below average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 11
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.4
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,493 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback