Lenovo 80E1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4B2
Memory1.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150821
Uptime14.6 Days
Run DateMay 02 '22 at 14:32
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6310 APU R4 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
32% Below average
Memory 51.6
1-Core 25.9
2-Core 49.5
29% 42.3 Pts
4-Core 72.2
8-Core 81.2
10% 76.7 Pts
64-Core 84.6
5% 84.6 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
1.38% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 2.4
1% 2.2 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 3
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.38%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ORIGAMI 256GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 155 182 176 175 169 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.9% Average
Read 333
Write 203
Mixed 184
SusWrite 170
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 9.2
50% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 61
69% 118 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 6GB
667, 800 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 6
16% 5.63 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 5.9
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80E1 Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback