Today's hottest deals

Monster TULPAR T5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster TULPAR T5  (all builds)
MotherboardMonster TULPAR T5
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20141201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '22 at 15:07
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$38
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 194
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 447
50% 391 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
MSI(1462 112D) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 44.3
Parallax 38.7
32% 40.9 fps
MRender 40.4
Gravity 40.5
Splatting 36.5
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD PLUS 480GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z31000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 275 276 271 271 270 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 348
Mixed 273
SusWrite 264
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 42.5
133% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 194
184% 289 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 108%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$64
2GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 102
Write 97.9
Mixed 72.3
68% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 71%
Kingston DT 101 G2 8GB
7GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7 8.9 8.8 8.6 8.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
5.61% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 8.5
Mixed 7.3
SusWrite 8.1
13% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron OEM MONSTER 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10.6
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T5 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback