Today's hottest deals

Asus A68HM-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-K  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200706
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 17 '22 at 15:34
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 64.4
2-Core 113
49% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 170
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Asus(1043 04BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1275 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Lighting 28.8
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 40.4
24% 32.6 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 24.9
24% 29.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$27
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 174 85 59 77 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 455
Write 226
Mixed 320
SusWrite 109
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 31.4
124% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 65.2
DQ Mixed 69.4
72% 123 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
465GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 195 198 190 189 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 195
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 193
110% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 109%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-018.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-K Builds (Compare 652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback