Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 09 '22 at 22:03
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 66.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 279
86% 162 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 1,104
97% 827 Pts
64-Core 1,902
118% 1,902 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$730
Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 219
Reflection 180
Parallax 235
178% 211 fps
MRender 45
Gravity 203
Splatting 11
64% 86.4 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 132%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 742 675 697 768 612 573 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
169% Outstanding
MC Read 71
MC Write 48.2
MC Mixed 86.9
196% 68.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 29.7
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 169%
Great: 231%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback