HP 241 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 241 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 8072
Memory0.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150427
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 06:14
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4 PRO-3340B HD Graphics
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
29.5% Poor
Memory 37.3
1-Core 33.5
2-Core 67.2
28% 46 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 130
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8240
HP(103C 8072) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.95% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.95%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545025A7E680 250GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GREOA350
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 46 48 40 38 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 7.5
Write 47.8
Mixed 14.1
SusWrite 41.8
20% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Not Available Available 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
6.86% Terrible
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 1.9
7% 2.4 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 0.2
SC Mixed 0.1
0% 0.13 GB/s
Latency 215
19% 215 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.86%
Great: 16%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 241 G1 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP 241 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback