Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X420FA_X420FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X420FA_X420FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X420FA
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 09:47
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 5405U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 125
53% 88.2 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 193
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Asus(1043 1901) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
2.47% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 3.6
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 5.9
3% 3.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.47%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 110 72 72 71 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 460
Write 357
Mixed 298
SusWrite 95.4
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 25.6
102% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 190
168% 249 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT52L256M32D1PF-09 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
62% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 20.2
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 18.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X420FA_X420FA Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X420FA_X420FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback