Today's hottest deals

Alienware Area 51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware Area 51  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 02:06
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3580
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 95.1
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 164
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 413
43% 345 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Nvidia(10DE 0969) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.5% Below average
Lighting 35
Reflection 36
Parallax 48
28% 39.7 fps
MRender 48.5
Gravity 43
Splatting 36.7
34% 42.7 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM810 FDE 2.5" 256GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM77D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 201 204 203 221 217 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 216
Write 217
Mixed 163
SusWrite 208
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 15.2
53% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 72.3
DQ Mixed 25.4
37% 69.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 52%
WD WD10EVDS-63N5B1 1TB
426GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 80 81 81 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 69.2
Write 75.1
Mixed 44.6
SusWrite 78.9
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
394GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 82 82 80 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 88.2
Write 89.2
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 81.1
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 69%
WD My Book 2TB
1TB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 37 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 32.9
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 36.6
44% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 3 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 22.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 15.5
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 56.9
70% 56.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Area 51 Builds (Compare 173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Alienware Area 51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $361
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback