Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X509UA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X509UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509UA
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '22 at 12:07
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 54.9
2-Core 89.5
46% 71 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 143
20% 145 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1A31) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 3.8
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 6.4
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 221 289 140 194 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 538
Write 422
Mixed 577
SusWrite 215
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 28.8
92% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 448
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 264
213% 307 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 4.5
15% 5.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X509UA Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X509UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback