Today's hottest deals

Asus A88XM-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A88XM-A  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '17 at 10:50
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 136
60% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 229
31% 229 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61% Good
Lighting 75.6
Reflection 77.5
Parallax 66.4
62% 73.2 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 74.7
60% 72.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61%
Great: 60%
AMD Radeon HD 8670D
Asus(1043 8526) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Lighting 7.83
Reflection 8.65
Parallax 7.5
6% 8 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 6.67
Splatting 8.39
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 492
Write 252
Mixed 273
74% 339 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 6.69
70% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 26.4
DQ Write 88.3
DQ Mixed 6.65
20% 40.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 99%
Asmt ASM1352R-Fast 480GB
27GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 343
Write 273
Mixed 305
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 13.1
70% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 87.3
DQ Write 11.6
DQ Mixed 0.35
13% 33.1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 72%
Asmt AKiTiO-Safe 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 162
Mixed 139
118% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.05
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 0.22
109% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 96%
ASMT 2105 4TB
79GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 29.8
Mixed 29.6
39% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.18
68% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston 9905584-032.A01LF CT102464BA160B.M16 Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
36.7% Below average
MC Read 18
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-A Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-A - $62

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback