Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X10SAE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X10SAE  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SAE
Memory10.8 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180525
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateMar 19 '22 at 16:17
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 206
67% 122 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 385
53% 392 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 23
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 33.2
19% 27.9 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 30.9
Splatting 26.4
25% 30.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 372 355 353 352 352 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 418
Write 334
Mixed 338
SusWrite 346
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 19.5
90% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 104
120% 200 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
928GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 176 177 179 177 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 158
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 175
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.7% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10SAE Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Supermicro X10SAE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback