Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus CG8250

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus CG8250 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CG8250
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111104
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '22 at 12:41
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2320-$142 38,345 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 84.9 2-Core 167 69% 114 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 324 44% 327 Pts	64-Core 310 19% 310 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 838C) 1GB CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	8.9% Terrible	Lighting 10.1 Reflection 16.9 Parallax 8.5 8% 11.8 fps	MRender 15.7 Gravity 11.6 Splatting 10.9 10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.9% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 250GB-$50 5,775 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61170RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 175 177 182 173 180 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.8% Average	Read 210 Write 184 Mixed 153 SusWrite 178 41% 181 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 35.5 4K Mixed 20.9 77% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 24.9 DQ Write 56.4 DQ Mixed 26.3 24% 35.9 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 106%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 459GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 140 140 142 142 141 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Read 136 Write 134 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 140 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 109%
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB 5,295 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 459GB free Firmware: 0707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 29 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 25.7 Write 25.8 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 29.1 20% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.5 124% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata EL63I1C1624ZV EL63I1C1624ZV 16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.4 50% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.1 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CG8250 Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CG8250

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $173Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	90x
Core i5-2320Intel $142Bench 64%, 38,345 samples	19x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	20x
GeForce GT 530NvidiaBench 3%, 5,672 samples	16x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	7x

SSD
Blue 250GBWD $75Bench 79%, 26,761 samples	9x
BX500 240GBCrucial $23Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $77Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x

RAM
EL63I1C1624ZV 2x4GBAdataBench 48%, 365 samples	9x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 51%, 10,062 samples	5x
EL63I1C1624ZV EL63I1C1624ZV 16GBAdataBench 48%, 10 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $498

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389