Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '22 at 20:14
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 77.7
1-Core 138
2-Core 276
88% 164 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 768
76% 621 Pts
64-Core 1,080
67% 1,080 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
Gigabyte(1458 231A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13023.4001
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 67.3
Parallax 113
58% 83.6 fps
MRender 55.2
Gravity 76.4
Splatting 43.7
46% 58.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 500GB SSD
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303123
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 657
Write 1,081
Mixed 296
152% 678 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 44.5
153% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 840
DQ Mixed 375
426% 728 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 266%
Amd-raid Array 1 239GB
103GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 192 191 195 193 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 574
Write 552
Mixed 369
SusWrite 226
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 18.8
60% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 668
DQ Mixed 195
217% 349 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 99%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
817GB free
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1236 365 370 375 368 375 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,157
Write 1,298
Mixed 1,194
SusWrite 515
234% 1,041 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 74.6
260% 97.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,308
DQ Write 1,066
DQ Mixed 1,150
871% 1,175 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 211%
Great: 276%
Amd-raid Hitachi HTS54505 500GB
194GB free
Firmware: GG2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 70 72 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 74.5
Write 61.9
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 70.6
43% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 49%
Amd-raid ST1000DM003-1SB1 1TB
95GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 117 116 118 117 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 177
Write 176
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 119
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 107%
Amd-raid WDC WD6400AAKS-2 640GB
207GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 71 71 72 72 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
46% Average
Read 88.3
Write 88.6
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 71.4
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46%
Great: 53%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA HDWD110 1TB
332GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 122 120 123 123 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 147
Write 125
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 123
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2666 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 34
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 33.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback