Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Sleekbook 14 PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Sleekbook 14 PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1902
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '22 at 22:01
Run Duration398 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-1800 APU (2012 M.Za)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Memory 46.6
1-Core 13.6
2-Core 37
23% 32.4 Pts
4-Core 38.2
8-Core 32.3
5% 35.2 Pts
64-Core 32.5
2% 32.5 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7340G
HP(103C 1902) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.151.1.1000
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 119 177 185 194 164 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.9% Below average
Read 210
Write 188
Mixed 185
SusWrite 168
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 10
36% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 82.7
DQ Mixed 41.5
45% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB CT25664BC1339.M8FM 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.7% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.9
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 3.3
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Sleekbook 14 PC Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Sleekbook 14 PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback