Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JAU_F512JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JAU_F512JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JAU
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '22 at 21:32
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 118
2-Core 209
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 299
40% 296 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1052) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 7.7
6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM128GDJTNG-831 128GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 179 172 176 174 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 884
Write 184
Mixed 400
SusWrite 177
90% 411 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 41.2
182% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 217
172% 239 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 112%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.8% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 23.8
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 22.9
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JAU_F512JA Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JAU_F512JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback