Today's hottest deals

Foxconn H61MXT1/F2/-S/-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardFoxconn H61MXT1/F2/-S/-V  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '22 at 17:38
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$60
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 41.9
2-Core 52.6
40% 56.5 Pts
4-Core 52.7
8-Core 31.2
6% 42 Pts
64-Core 20.5
1% 20.5 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Device(105B 0D74) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.2
Parallax 0.2
0% 0.33 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.9
1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Supersspeed S540 240GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 59 15 85 10 18 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.1% Very poor
Read 255
Write 216
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 44
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.3
23% 6 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MD3512NSA-HA3G1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 4.2
16% 5.47 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 5
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MXT1/F2/-S/-V Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H61MXT1/F2/-S/-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback