Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A315-53

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-53  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Metapod_KL
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateMar 04 '22 at 18:39
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4417U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 55.3
2-Core 113
48% 79.1 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 158
19% 146 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
Acer(1025 1295) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.4% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 3.2
0% 2.27 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 5.9
4% 4.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.4%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM002J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 75 64 64 51 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 75.5
Write 57
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 62.4
39% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 60%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power8G 8GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 8.4 8.4 8.4 7.9 7.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Read 15
Write 5.7
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 8
10% 8.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8001 R744G2133S1S 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18.1
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-53 Builds (Compare 886 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback