Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D15)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics78.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D15
MotherboardMSI MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D15)  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210618
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 12:28
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900F-$229
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 180
2-Core 348
110% 206 Pts
4-Core 644
8-Core 1,097
106% 870 Pts
64-Core 1,603
99% 1,603 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$244
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Lighting 107
Reflection 87.1
Parallax 103
87% 98.9 fps
MRender 84.4
Gravity 74.8
Splatting 67.2
61% 75.5 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 240GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0705AB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 80 54 52 52 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 428
Mixed 400
SusWrite 86.8
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 48
169% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 236
193% 274 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 90%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
30GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 259 236 83 82 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 476
Mixed 365
SusWrite 187
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 49.6
184% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 254
214% 312 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
155GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 150 139 140 145 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 118
Write 112
Mixed 84.1
SusWrite 142
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 109%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27
30GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 16 17 16 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 38.2
Write 25.7
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 16
30% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 6
532% 7.23 MB/s
DQ Read 8.3
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 3.5
470% 7.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AMD R7S48G2606U2S 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
88% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 27.4
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 27.5
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D15) Builds (Compare 3,236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MAG B560 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D15)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $541
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback