Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics64.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '22 at 03:41
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 89.4
1-Core 140
2-Core 278
93% 169 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 989
94% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,018
63% 1,018 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
HP(103C 8789) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.7% Good
Lighting 80.6
Reflection 79.1
Parallax 73.9
66% 77.9 fps
MRender 99.2
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 65.2
63% 78.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,062
Write 1,564
Mixed 1,138
351% 1,588 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 58.5
192% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 948
DQ Write 766
DQ Mixed 844
635% 853 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 235%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 (TurboPC EX) 2TB
340GB free
Firmware: MX4OAC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 101 105 115 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 168
Write 159
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 110
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 24.3
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 25.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback