Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display800 x 480 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 20:44
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 203
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 624
60% 494 Pts
64-Core 822
51% 822 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.25
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 21.6
17% 20 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 16
16% 20.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 248 234 211 209 199 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 480
Write 330
Mixed 338
SusWrite 216
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 32.3
4K Mixed 26.3
103% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 78.6
DQ Mixed 170
140% 210 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74%
Great: 124%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$92
732GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 379 415 395 410 408 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 488
Write 391
Mixed 402
SusWrite 381
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 27.6
111% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 68.6
DQ Mixed 117
113% 189 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 137%
H/W RAID1 3TB
402GB free
Firmware: 02101040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 96 100 97 100 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 109
Write 105
Mixed 11
SusWrite 95.9
58% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 82%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 16GB
14GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 5.7 8.3 7.2 7.4 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.32% Terrible
Read 19.6
Write 12.4
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 7.4
18% 14 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.4
106% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.32%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 35.6
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 21.2
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback