Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120711
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '22 at 16:25
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 57.2
2-Core 116
55% 86.2 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 229
30% 229 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.3% Below average
Lighting 40.3
Reflection 36.8
Parallax 36
33% 37.7 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 24.4
25% 31.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 135 132 100 136 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 373
Write 297
Mixed 270
SusWrite 148
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 12.6
64% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 95.2
DQ Mixed 35.7
46% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 56%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 593GB
414GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 24 25 52 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.4% Very poor
Read 116
Write 102
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 31.2
17% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 1.5
18% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 5.1
DQ Write 37
DQ Mixed 0.2
6% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 69%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
68GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 89 88 89 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 94.7
Write 90.6
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 87.5
110% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
3.5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 108 106 104 106 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 58.3
Write 68.3
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 102
103% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
168% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3X2G1600C8 CMX4GX3M2A1600C7 CM3X2G1600C8 CMX4GX3M2A1600C7 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 13.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.9
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback