Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 835 13 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive473% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 835 13 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8990
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220128
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 04:28
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 73.1
1-Core 170
2-Core 336
101% 193 Pts
4-Core 607
8-Core 1,023
99% 815 Pts
64-Core 1,195
74% 1,195 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 1681) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.40
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.4% Poor
Lighting 28.4
Reflection 44.3
Parallax 51.2
23% 41.3 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 41.4
27% 31.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA1T0TFH-1BC1AABHA 1TB
889GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2820 2827 3025 2902 3927 3621 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
473% Outstanding
Read 3,916
Write 3,830
Mixed 2,416
SusWrite 3,187
750% 3,337 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 76.8
258% 92.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,107
DQ Write 776
DQ Mixed 966
715% 950 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 473%
Great: 496%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT60B1G16HC-48B:A 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 45.1
MC Mixed 38.4
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 27.6
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 111%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 835 13 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: HP EliteBook 835 13 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $284WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback