Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 REV 3.1  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 18 '17 at 01:46
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$150
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 94.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 200
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 512
53% 426 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$170
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59% Above average
Lighting 66.7
Reflection 76.9
Parallax 62.5
54% 68.7 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 87
68% 83 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 59%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 412
Mixed 422
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 37.5
132% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 395
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 122
141% 247 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23
294GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 150
Write 150
Mixed 166
117% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.3
83% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 26.4
Write 23.5
Mixed 3.76
20% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.23
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.43
67% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.8% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.8
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.8
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 59.3
67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback