Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160119
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '22 at 17:25
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 98.4
50% 78.4 Pts
4-Core 98
8-Core 89.3
13% 93.7 Pts
64-Core 88.7
6% 88.7 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Zotac(19DA 3265) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.9% Poor
Lighting 29.4
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 42.4
24% 34.2 fps
MRender 41
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 31.3
30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
889GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 41 74 106 137 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 375
Write 264
Mixed 242
SusWrite 105
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 5.3
36% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 17.4
DQ Mixed 30
30% 51.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
860GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 81 92 146 148 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 162
Write 116
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 128
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 83%
Great: 112%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
9GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.6 4.6 6.2 6.7 5.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
9.92% Terrible
Read 29.4
Write 7.3
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 5.7
12% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2
122% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.92%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8C 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 8.4
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-H Builds (Compare 378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback