Asus K55N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus K55N  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K55N
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '17 at 23:21
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4500M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 26.3
2-Core 39.5
34% 45 Pts
4-Core 33.1
8-Core 39.2
5% 36.2 Pts
64-Core 33.7
2% 33.7 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Asus(1043 105B) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
2.36% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 2.97
2% 3.24 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 5.52
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.3% Poor
Read 241
Write 131
Mixed 126
36% 166 MB/s
4K Read 7.51
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 6.12
25% 7.96 MB/s
DQ Read 77.9
DQ Write 19.1
DQ Mixed 11.2
18% 36 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 110%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
326GB free
Firmware: GG2OA6C0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 79.7
Write 73
Mixed 63.3
54% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 0.81
4K Mixed 0.12
46% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3N18AES4.16FE BLS4G3N18AES4.16FE 8GB
933, 933 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.8% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 10.8
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8.6
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K55N Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K55N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $20
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback