Lenovo 20150

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20150  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121219
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 30 '22 at 00:15
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 81.8
2-Core 134
62% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 201
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.83 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 35 100 100 101 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 48
Write 92.6
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 87.7
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.8
194% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NN3M004G15H 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 15.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20150 Builds (Compare 836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback