Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 1810T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire 1810T  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JM11-MS
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100831
Uptime18.9 Days
Run DateJan 29 '22 at 07:43
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Solo U3500
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 21.8
2-Core 21.2
28% 35.5 Pts
4-Core 21.4
8-Core 21.4
3% 21.4 Pts
64-Core 20.7
1% 20.7 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 029B)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.31% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.47 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.8
1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.31%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2555GSX 250GB-$77
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FG001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 64 40 49 36 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 71.8
Write 70.8
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 50.4
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M4 70T5663QZ3-CE6 M4 70T5663EH3-CE6 4GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 17%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 1810T Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 1810T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $33
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback