Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_F415EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_F415EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X415EA
Memory12.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '22 at 02:31
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 205
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 262
31% 239 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 17D2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9929
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.36% Terrible
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 11.7
9% 11.4 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 12.2
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.36%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 1TB
860GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 925 924 675 1300 1424 1313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,115
Write 1,299
Mixed 1,287
SusWrite 1,093
271% 1,199 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 49.4
164% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 598
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 520
369% 476 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 183%
Great: 354%
Mass Storage Device 128GB
30GB free, PID 1212, samsung 980
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 14 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 12.5
Write 12.4
Mixed 10.1
SusWrite 14.8
17% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.2
137% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE Adata 20GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.7% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 12.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 10.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_F415EA Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_F415EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback