Today's hottest deals

HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory20.5 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 22 '22 at 20:06
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 130
57% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 467
44% 367 Pts
64-Core 1,072
66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3214) 3GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.1% Below average
Lighting 49.2
Reflection 36.7
Parallax 58
40% 48 fps
MRender 31.2
Gravity 48.9
Splatting 26.5
28% 35.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 341
Write 344
Mixed 39.3
174% 241 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
237% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 213%
WD My Passport 25E2 2TB
89GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.6
Write 20.9
Mixed 20.5
28% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 53%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
28GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.8
Write 15
Mixed 17.4
24% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback