Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) 28,018 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Memory 40.8 1-Core 35.4 2-Core 68.8 29% 48.3 Pts	4-Core 121 8-Core 127 16% 124 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 40,685 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 80C7) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	1.89% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 3.2 Parallax 3.5 2% 2.93 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 3.4 2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 2%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$71 31,280 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 401GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02K0S86D Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 406 Write 341 Mixed 339 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 37 117% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 136 106% 147 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 127%
Adata XPG SX930 240GB-$80 1,536 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 163GB free Firmware: 6.8SE Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 371 Write 332 Mixed 302 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 34.2 111% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 144 118% 168 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 12GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.5% Very poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 6 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 5.9 15% 5.2 GB/s	Latency 198 20% 198 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2,526x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,766x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,192x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	404x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	383x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	351x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28