Today's hottest deals

Panasonic FZG1-3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPanasonic FZG1-3  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic FZG1-3
Memory4.6 GB free of 8.01562 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151211
Uptime11.7 Days
Run DateJan 08 '22 at 23:28
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5300U
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 74.7
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 146
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 224
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.6
4% 4.6 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 5
Splatting 7.6
5% 6.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_M510_MSATA_256GB 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DL06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 316 315 314 330 332 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 432
Write 342
Mixed 309
SusWrite 310
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 29.7
106% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 174
172% 274 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FZG1-3 6ATSA33737 0032 FZG1-3 6ATSA33737 56GB
1600, 1600, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.2% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.3
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 16.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FZG1-3 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic FZG1-3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback