Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-WRX80-SU8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 335%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics219% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGIGABYTE WRX80-SU8 N/A
MotherboardGigabyte GA-WRX80-SU8  (all builds)
Memory243.1 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210618
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 05 '22 at 02:15
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 32-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 62.6
1-Core 148
2-Core 297
88% 169 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1122
100% 847 Pts
64-Core 5,735
355% 5,735 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,400
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
219% Outstanding
Lighting 326
Reflection 294
Parallax 329
266% 316 fps
MRender 363
Gravity 264
Splatting 191
214% 273 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 219%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$215
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 412 413 414 414 414 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 402
Mixed 394
SusWrite 412
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 43.9
142% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 181
140% 192 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 133%
WD WUH721414ALE6L4 14TB
13TB free
Firmware: LDGNW07G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 212 196 212 216 214 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK256GX4M8A2666C16 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
135% Outstanding
MC Read 59.2
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 67.3
155% 54.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 31.6
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 135%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-WRX80-SU8 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 237%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-WRX80-SU8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,599
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback