Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400T 1,635 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 104 2-Core 195 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 583 60% 486 Pts	64-Core 584 36% 584 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1642 3E56) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	5.42% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 8.4 6% 6.87 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 7.4 Splatting 7.2 5% 6.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.42% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ128MEE1MWX 128GB 883 User benchmarks, average bench 123% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0C0628 SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 185 172 172 173 169 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 1,678 Write 615 Mixed 777 SusWrite 183 178% 813 MB/s	4K Read 53.1 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 67.6 232% 80.8 MB/s	DQ Read 417 DQ Write 421 DQ Mixed 244 232% 361 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 177%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD M471A1K43CB1-CTD 12GB 1,790 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 15.4 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 17.7 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 72%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	4x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	1x

SSD
MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 188%, 10,512 samples	3x
RPJTJ128MEE1MWX 128GBUmisBench 123%, 883 samples	3x
TOSHIBA MEMORY 256GBKbg40znt256gBench 164%, 3,446 samples	1x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD M471A1K43CB1-CTD 12GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,790 samples	5x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GBSamsungBench 68%, 25 samples	2x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GBMicronBench 77%, 166 samples	1x