Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire XC-605

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-605
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140321
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 29 '21 at 11:10
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$30
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 91
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 168
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 268
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 109 146 152 162 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 182
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 140
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
220% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 109%
WDC WD50 00LPVX-22V0TT0 500GB
62GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36.3
Write 35.5
Mixed 18.5
37% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-605 Builds (Compare 475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback