Today's hottest deals

Asus ET2410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus ET2410  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ET2410
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120322
Uptime9.3 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 03:07
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$142
LGA 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 63.9
2-Core 165
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 314
43% 317 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 0102) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.6% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.9 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.6%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
563GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 107 101 104 113 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 114
Write 110
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 105
72% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 68%
WD My Passport 2626 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 2626
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 95 100 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61% Good
Read 127
Write 103
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 98.5
128% 98 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.8
263% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 61%
Great: 62%
WD My Passport 2626 4TB
3TB free, PID 2626
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 105 105 104 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 112
Write 86.3
Mixed 68.6
SusWrite 104
123% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 62%
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB
6GB free, PID 3623, J
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 6.8 7.8 7.9 6.7 7.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Read 15.8
Write 5.2
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 7.3
9% 8.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ET2410 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ET2410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback