Today's hottest deals

Foxconn A74ML-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardFoxconn A74ML-K  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100618
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 27 '21 at 17:43
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9750
Socket 940, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 18.5
2-Core 59.6
33% 47.9 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 123
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4500
Gigabyte(1458 21ED) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 1.6
1% 2.17 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 952
327% 318 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 110%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 116 59 94 107 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 106
Write 126
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 77.2
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.3
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A74ML-K Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn A74ML-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback