PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191206 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 23 '21 at 14:30 |
Run Duration | 174 Seconds |
Run User | IDN-User |
Background CPU | 33% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
49%
Average
|
57% 104 Pts
|
36% 279 Pts
|
15% 245 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1410 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.9%
Above average
|
56% 72.9 fps
|
48% 60.2 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2019)-$59
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 514 348 350 343 347 345 MB/s
|
162%
Outstanding
|
273% 1,220 MB/s
|
163% 56.8 MB/s
|
333% 520 MB/s
|
![]() Midasforce 240GB 240GB
177GB free
Firmware: 907XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 353 53 39 39 40 MB/s
|
32.9%
Below average
|
48% 214 MB/s
|
25% 8.43 MB/s
|
50% 84.6 MB/s
|
![]() SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
13GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.3 3.8 3.1 3.5 4.3 MB/s
|
6.17%
Terrible
|
9% 9.62 MB/s
|
33% 1.3 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
57%
Above average
|
63% 22 GB/s
|
32% 11.2 GB/s
|
27% 148 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $75Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 1,407x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $140Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 815x |
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 474x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $267Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 430x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 298x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 296x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $410 |