Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 23 '21 at 14:30
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 53.7
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 170
57% 104 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 313
36% 279 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1410 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.9% Above average
Lighting 68.2
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 88.6
56% 72.9 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 45.1
48% 60.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2019)-$59
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 514 348 350 343 347 345 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,554
Write 1,553
Mixed 1,396
SusWrite 375
273% 1,220 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 48.1
163% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 818
DQ Write 375
DQ Mixed 368
333% 520 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 162%
Great: 238%
Midasforce 240GB 240GB
177GB free
Firmware: 907XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 353 53 39 39 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 329
Write 363
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 135
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 1.6
25% 8.43 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 44.4
50% 84.6 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 72%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
13GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.3 3.8 3.1 3.5 4.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Read 28.1
Write 1.5
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 3.2
9% 9.62 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
33% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
57% Above average
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 23.6
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 57%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback