Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 10SC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R5  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '21 at 00:00
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 131
2-Core 253
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 789
80% 646 Pts
64-Core 1,010
62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
MSI(1462 12F4) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6221
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.5% Below average
Lighting 43.4
Reflection 50.8
Parallax 41.8
35% 45.3 fps
MRender 51.2
Gravity 41
Splatting 40.5
36% 44.2 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AI1 256GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 885 632 319 321 330 332 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,314
Write 1,149
Mixed 1,098
SusWrite 470
226% 1,008 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 66
223% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 411
DQ Write 583
DQ Mixed 803
522% 599 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 173%
Great: 211%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (84th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 11.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R5 Builds (Compare 5,028 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback