Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '21 at 16:35
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 202
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 325
47% 346 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
HP(103C 8338) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.63
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.6% Poor
Lighting 32.3
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 31
26% 31.9 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 22.4
24% 30.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 380 252 73 66 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 368
Write 362
Mixed 304
SusWrite 198
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 37.7
132% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 129
104% 148 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 153 152 150 151 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 119
Write 120
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 148
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
101% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 90%
HTS54101 0G9AT00 100GB
88GB free, PID 6830
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 33 32 32 33 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 31.1
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 31.6
39% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 12GB
2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.8% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 12.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Power Desktop 580-0xx Builds (Compare 481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $161
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback