Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X571GT
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '21 at 12:13
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 129
2-Core 249
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 745
74% 603 Pts
64-Core 898
56% 898 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1A81) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6259
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.4% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 49.9
46% 56.4 fps
MRender 41.9
Gravity 48.9
Splatting 46.8
38% 45.9 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel HBRPEKNX0202A 512GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 235 55 92 57 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 922
Write 827
Mixed 709
SusWrite 105
143% 641 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 66.5
212% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 633
DQ Mixed 342
300% 436 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 132%
Great: 207%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 21.6
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 23.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT Builds (Compare 653 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $66
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback