Novatech N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemNovatech N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1  (all builds)
MotherboardNovatech N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '21 at 13:07
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 172
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 501
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.35% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 3
2% 15.4 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.35%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$53
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B1T3NA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,256
Write 1543
Mixed 1,217
369% 1,672 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 46.4
159% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 868
DQ Write 689
DQ Mixed 588
492% 715 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 311%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB
93GB free
Firmware: M0MU031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 383 382 373 157 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 439
Write 436
Mixed 377
SusWrite 310
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 36.1
130% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 303
220% 283 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43EB1-CPB 029E CMSO8GX4M1A2133C15 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.4% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 20.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Novatech N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback