MSI Z77A-G45 (MS-7752)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7752
MotherboardMSI Z77A-G45 (MS-7752)  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130929
Uptime13.5 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 23:12
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 197
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 511
51% 415 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Lighting 66.3
Reflection 74.1
Parallax 66.3
54% 68.9 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 58.2
52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme II 240GB-$110
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1311
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 451
Write 392
Mixed 226
79% 356 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 29.8
118% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 154
164% 271 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 109%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
35GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 211 173 172 162 151 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70% Good
Read 255
Write 234
Mixed 224
SusWrite 171
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 37.7
131% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 197
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70%
Great: 124%
Intel 330 Series 180GB
48GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 201 195 194 203 203 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 387
Write 192
Mixed 218
SusWrite 190
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 28.4
121% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 171
141% 205 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 83%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
117GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 220 215 231 232 231 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.6% Good
Read 256
Write 220
Mixed 216
SusWrite 214
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 29
108% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 143
119% 170 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128
323GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 109 107 109 110 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 120
Write 110
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 107
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 138 137 141 141 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 125
Write 126
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 136
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 101%
Sony QD-G32E 30GB
20GB free, PID 087c
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 310
Write 175
Mixed 110
221% 198 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 3.8
231% 6.33 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 17
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77A-G45 (MS-7752) Builds (Compare 1,244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-G45 (MS-7752)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback