Today's hottest deals

HP Desktop Pro A MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Desktop Pro A MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8434
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 08 '21 at 22:37
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 67.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 191
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 435
58% 431 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Lighting 33.4
Reflection 35.6
Parallax 33.7
27% 34.2 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 34.1
Splatting 24.1
26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 4.8 4.9 5.4 4.8 4.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 460
Write 354
Mixed 310
SusWrite 29.1
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 37.1
126% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 117
94% 132 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 91%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
74GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 102 99 100 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 129
Write 127
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 101
71% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BSW4U3000E16082C 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 29.7
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 24.2
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop Pro A MT Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop Pro A MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback