Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 772 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Memory 45.4 1-Core 66.6 2-Core 150 47% 87.3 Pts	4-Core 299 8-Core 648 55% 473 Pts	64-Core 2,498 155% 2,498 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% MSI(1462 3681) CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.2 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.3% Very good	Lighting 97.7 Reflection 107 Parallax 150 80% 118 fps	MRender 89.3 Gravity 107 Splatting 75.9 73% 90.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 220GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1409 1419 1417 1400 1239 1210 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	218% Outstanding	Read 1858 Write 1,413 Mixed 839 SusWrite 1349 305% 1,365 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 76.6 4K Mixed 39.8 150% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 404 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 346 261% 352 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 218% Great: 283%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 154GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 286 287 285 285 285 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 308 Write 270 Mixed 273 SusWrite 285 64% 284 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 35.4 4K Mixed 28.7 92% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 155 115% 152 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 99%
Hitachi HUS72302CLAR2000 2TB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1.5TB free Firmware: C1D8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 148 Write 41.3 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 41.9 52% 71.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965447-030.A 8x4GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	77% Very good	MC Read 39 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 31.8 93% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 3.8 14% 4.97 GB/s	Latency 179 22% 179 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	10x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2695 v21stBench 62%, 378 samples	1x

GPU
RX Vega-56AMD $170Bench 78%, 92,053 samples	9x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	1x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $350Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	9x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	1x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	1x

RAM
9965447-030.A 8x4GBKingstonBench 80%, 15 samples	9x
HMT84GL7AMR4C 4x31.8GBHynixBench 89%, 18 samples	1x
M393B1K70DH0- 6x8GBSamsungBench 78%, 17 samples	1x

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $500